Racial Discrimination in Tibet (2000)
Discrimination in Public Representation
Corrupt and Farcical Elections
According to
Article 21 (3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR),
"The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority
of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic
and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal
suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent
free voting procedures."
Leaving aside the issue that the will of the Tibetan people
has never, and probably will never be the basis of the
authority of government in Chinese-occupied Tibet, the
notion of "genuine" elections - at any level - has for a
long time been dispelled by refugee testimonies. Despite
guarantees in the Chinese constitution that anyone
over 18, "regardless of nationality", can vote and
stand for election, Tibetans unanimously report that
elections are mere puppet shows attempting to legitimize
Chinese claims that Tibetans enjoy democratic rights and
autonomy. Candidates who are not directly selected by the
government are rigorously screened to ensure that they
are compliant with communist policies, so that even if
the rules of a secret vote are obeyed - which they rarely
are - the result will not affect the strength of communist
rule. As the Alliance for Research in Tibet found,
"While elections do occur, candidates are carefully
vetted if not actually selected by Party organs. There
is no opposition to Party principle or policy. Refusal to
tolerate opposition candidates or parties is based on the
premise that they are anti-China, therefore legally and
logically unqualified to represent Chinese people. The
"autonomous" Tibetan lives at the bottom of a long ladder
of Chinese government and Party institutions."
39 year-old
Dorje Tongmey
experienced "elections" in both Kandze "TAP" in Sichuan
Province and Lhasa, where he lived for 17 years before
escaping to India in February 2000. "Tibetans have very
little opportunity to participate in government decisions
at any level. Elections are pointless pieces of propaganda
- democratic facades that hide an internal selection
process. Leaders and officials are always elected from
the top down: Prefecture officials will appoint those
in County administration, and they in turn will choose
those to run the township. We are called upon to "vote"
during these proceedings, but as the candidates are all
chosen by the Party, whatever we do makes no difference -
the decisions have already been made. Even if, for some
strange reason, an independent candidate was allowed to
stand against a Party candidate in a genuine election,
there are more Chinese than Tibetans in most areas now,
so the result would only preserve the status quo."
Soepa
from Pelbar County in Chamdo Prefecture fled Tibet in
October 1999. "There was a voting system in my village,
but it was always predetermined. The Chinese authorities
would select only those that were completely loyal to the
Communist Party as candidates, so there was no point in us
'voting'. We had to vote anyway however, because we were
told that if we didn't we would be punished."
41 year-old
Thupten
from Golog Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture confirmed this
threat of punishment. "The people in my area were very
discontent when an election was announced. We knew that the
candidates selected had already been carefully vetted by
higher Chinese officials, and that our "voting" was mere
lip-service to Chinese claims of democracy, but we did
it anyway. The officials made sure that we attended the
election and that no-one spoke out against the process. If
we had tried to complain, I"m sure we would have been
arrested."
23 year-old
Kunsang Gyal
from Tsonub "TAP" in Qinghai Province arrived in exile
in August 1999. "All candidates in county elections were
pre-determined by the higher prefecture leaders. Their
names would only be announced a few hours before the
actual election, so we didn't really know who or what we
were voting for - only that they would be loyal to the
"great motherland". Candidates were nearly always Chinese,
because the authorities told us that Tibetans "were
not experienced or intelligent enough to lead the people
forward". So in villages where almost all inhabitants were
Tibetan, the local officials would be Chinese. Furthermore,
we were told that it would be useless to complain, because
according to "election law", no person has the authority
to dismiss a county leader who has been elected by the
People's Congress of that county. However, this seemed
to be true only for the Chinese leaders, as there were a
number of elected Tibetan officials in my area removed by
the prefectural authorities for no apparent reason. They
were then replaced by Chinese."
[ Next:
Village Self-Government and Neighbourhood Committees --> ]
[ Contents ]
|