Racial Discrimination in Tibet (2000)
Discrimination in Healthcare
Tibetan Children and Infant Mortality
China's White Paper claims concerning the health of Tibetan
children continue to distort and conceal the true nature
of their condition. In 1992 China asserted proudly that
"[c]ompared with 1965, the average height and weight
of young Tibetans in the Lhasa area increased by 8.8cm
and 5.2kg respectively". Yet a comprehensive survey of
health and nutritional situation in the Lhasa valley in
1990 concluded that weight-for-age and height-for-age of
Tibetan children were "borderline unacceptable" and in
certain counties "unacceptably low" by WHO standards. The
Western Consortium for Public Health, a private US-based
concern, also concluded in 1996 that the height of Tibetan
children was a matter of grave concern, and directly linked
to the lack of cost of primary healthcare in the "TAR":
"Many children within the "TAR" are extremely short for
their age, so short that 60% fall drastically below
accepted international growth reference values. Data
indicates that this shortness is a result of nutritional
stunting - chronic malnutrition during the first three
years of life - rather than a result of genetics or
altitude, as previously assumed. These findings should be
cause for alarm. Nutritional stress at this critical period
in a child's early growth affects neurological development
and increases risk of acute illness and death. Chronic
malnutrition renders children vulnerable to the common
fatal diseases of childhood in the developing world
diarrhea and pneumonia. Therefore, an entire generation
of children is now at risk""
The Consortium also found that the sweeping changes to
traditional patterns of Tibetan existence enforced by the
Chinese have also had serious long term effects on the
health of Tibetan children:
"The dire health status of Tibetan children is further
complicated by the disruption of traditional food and
agricultural patterns. This reflects the far-reaching
effects of even subtle alterations in indigenous cultures
confronting the challenges of rapid change" Three years
of research has documented an area of huge neglect
regarding the health of this unique and endangered human
population."
Similarly, while the Chinese proudly claim that they have
reduced the Tibetan infant mortality rate "from 43% in
1959 to 3.677% in 1998", the fact still remains that this
is triple the overall mortality rates for infants in China
in its entirety. Furthermore, the Chinese assertion that
it has increased the average life expectancy of Tibetan
people "from less than 36 years before 1949 to the current
65 years" ignores the fact that this still ranks Tibetans
as the lowest of China's 18 major nationalities.
[ Next:
Discriminatory Charges --> ]
[ Contents ]
|