Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy

Human Rights Update and Archives

June 2002

Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok back at Serthar Institute  [ read ]
Geshe Sonam Phuntsok's continued detention raises concern  [ read ]
Gyaltsen Dolker released  [ read ]
Chinese land policies restrict nomadic life  [ read ]
Behind Bars for supporting a "splittist"  [ read ]
Religious restriction in Gaden Tashi Choeling Monastery  [ read ]
Winning Essays on Torture  [ read ]
Cultural Development Society closed  [ read ]
4th Preparatory Committee Meeting on WSSD in Bali, Indonesia  [ read ]
TCHRD attend ex-political prisoners' annual picnic  [ read ]
Farewell to TCHRD staff  [ read ]
[ top ]

Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok back at Serthar Institute

The Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy has received information that Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok has returned to Serthar Buddhist Institute at 11 a.m. on 24 June 2002. Khenpo was reportedly given an elaborate reception on his return.

Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok, 65 years old, is the abbot of Serthar Institute. He was reportedly held in house arrest in Chengdu, Sichuan's provincial capital, since late autumn 2001. Reports indicated that he recently underwent knee surgery, although his heart disease appears to have improved.

Khenpo was held incommunicado for several months. He was being treated by an unknown physician when his health condition deteriorated. His personal physician, Rinzin, from Barkham military hospital, was denied access. Thereafter, no outside visitors were allowed.

Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok founded Serthar Buddhist Institute in 1980 to meet the pressing need for renewal of meditation and scholarship all over Tibet in the wake of China's Cultural Revolution. Serthar Buddhist Institute situated in Karze "Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture" ("TAP"), Sichuan Province, has recently come under Chinese persecution. This Institute had over the years expanded from a solitary mountain hermitage to a spiritual oasis for approximately 9,000 monks, nuns and lay people drawn from Tibet, China and South East Asia.

In July 2001, the Chinese authorities labeled the institute "illegal" and ordered its closure. Since then over 2,000 dwellings have been demolished. The most recent reports were of 18 dwellings destroyed late April/early May 2002. Although exact numbers of expulsions are impossible to discern, it appears that over 7,000 were evicted from the Institute.

For more details on Serthar Buddhist Institute, the Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy has well-documented literature and a documentary about the demolition of Serthar Institute. Visit our website - www.tchrd.org.

[ top ]

Geshe Sonam Phuntsok's continued detention raises concern

According to reliable information received from Tibet, local Tibetans of Rongbatsang District, Karze County, Karze "TAP", Sichuan, are gravely concerned about Geshe Sonam Phuntsok's continued detention in the light of a recent public announcement. Geshe Sonam Phuntsok is revered as a great Buddhist practitioner and scholar in the Karze region.

On 21 May 2002, three high-level Karze officials arrived at Rongbatsang District, hometown of Geshe, to address a public meeting at the Sub-District office. One of the three officials is Lolong Ta, the second head of Karze County, and the other two are subordinate officials.

The visiting officials addressed the crowd and announced possible release of Geshe Sonam Phuntsok. They said, "when Geshe is released, nobody should show any sign of delight nor resort to any protest measures. Owing to the news, if anyone creates any disturbance, it shall be deemed as protest against the motherland and the culprit shall be accordingly punished."

"It has now been a month since the announcement was made but Geshe is still not released. We have now come to believe that the announcement was made to fool the general public. It is a well-chalked out plan by the Chinese authorities to create panic amongst the followers and supporters of Geshe. Some people say that the announcement was a deliberate move to test public reaction about the news and to observe their activities as a result of such an announcement. Their intention was not actually to release Geshe," commented one local Tibetan.

This is corroborated by the fact that one of Geshe's close reltiaves visited Geshe in Chunagdong Prison no. 3 in May 2002. The head of Chunagdong Prison, Yonten, reportedly told the relative that Geshe will not be released because he has a sentence to complete. Unless there is some specific order from higher authorities in Beijing, he could not be released at all.

Reports indicate that Geshe Sonam Phuntsok continues to be interrogated three times a week although it appears that he has recovered slightly from his earlier illness. There is reportedly renewed heightened security arrangement in the prison. Geshe is interrogated with questions such as "What is the basis of Buddhism that you all Tibetans are so devoted to? What were the things you say to your followers when you conduct religious ceremonies before? Do you love the Chinese motherland? How do Tibetans respect the Dalai Lama? What is your personal opinion about the teachings of the Dalai Lama?"

On 25 October 1999, Geshe was arrested and detained in Dartsedo Prison in Dartsedo County, Karze "TAP", for one year and four months.

In March 2001, Geshe was formally sentenced to five years' imprisonment. He was accused of "inciting splittist activities among the masses, seeking an audience with the Dalai Lama and for conducting long-life prayer ceremony for the Dalai Lama", among other charges.

In December 2001, TCHRD received information about Geshe's serious ill health. Geshe, at that time, was suffering from high fever, diarrhoea, dizziness and lethargy. Although on two occasions, Geshe was taken to a nearby military hospital, kept on three IV drips and hospitalised for seven hours, it did not bring about much improvement. In June 2002, it came to be known that Geshe has ulcer and low blood pressure but is reportedly out of danger.

[ top ]

Gyaltsen Dolkar Released

TCHRD has received confirmed information from reliable sources that Gyaltsen Dolkar, layname Dawa, has been released from Drapchi Prison on 21 March 2002. She is currently at her home in Meldro Gungkar.

Gyaltsen Dolkar is a 31-year-old Garu nun from Meldro Gungkar County, Lhasa City serving a 12 year-prison term. Her expected date of release was 21 August 2002. TCHRD has no confirmed information on the reasons behind her release. Updates will follow upon further inquiries.

Gyaltsen Dolkar is the third nun political prisoner to be released prior to her due date including Ngawang Choekyi and Tenzin Thupten. Unconfirmed reports indicate that Gyaltsen was meant to visit a hospital in Lhasa for treatment but has not done so. Former political prisoners have testified to TCHRD that Gyaltsen Dolkar's health condition has been precarious since an uprising in Drapchi Prison in 1998.

TCHRD believes that Gyaltsen Dolkar may have been released on medical parole. With only few months away from her date of release, TCHRD is concerned that her current health condition may be precarious although nothing is confirmed to date.

On 21 August 1990, a group of 16 pro-independence demonstrators, including seven nuns from Garu Nunnery eight from Michungri Nunnery and one monk from Sera initiated a demonstration disrupting a state-run opera festival. It was the first day of the weeklong Shoton (Yogurt) festival. The group shouted slogans protesting the Chinese settlers and supporting the Dalai Lama. They were immediately arrested and taken away by the PSB of Lhasa City.

Gyaltsen Dolkar was among Garu nuns sentenced on 30 November 1990, for "counter-revolutionary' activities. She was sentenced to four years in prison and deprived of political rights for one year.

In June 1993, while still in prison, Gyaltsen and 13 other nuns recorded songs and messages to their families and friends on a smuggled tape recorder. Each nun dedicated a song or poem expressing their feelings of hope and aspirations. When prison authorities discovered this "clandestine" activity, the nuns faced severe repercussions. On 8 October 1993, the nuns had their sentences extended ranging from five to nine years. Gyaltsen received an eight-year extension bringing her current total sentence to 12 years.

[ top ]

Chinese land policies restrict nomadic life

Khundrup, 28, from Karze "TAP", Sichuan Province, reported to TCHRD, "Being a nomad, my family moved with our herds according to the seasons; in warm weather we go to the higher mountains, in winter we come to lower lands. However, since the late 1970s, the Chinese authorities began restricting the places that we normally go. At certain times of the year the authorities order us to move our herds to a newer pasture even though the seasons may not have changed. If we don't move on as ordered, we were fined 150 yuan per day regardless of whether it snows or rains.

"The authorities also demanded that the boundaries of the local areas be fenced. Hence, we had to buy the fencing material from the government and build the fences ourselves. The amount each family had to pay for the fencing was calculated according to the number of animals owned by the family. A bundle of fencing wire costs 1,500 yuan. My family owned 100 animals so we bought six bundles of fencing wire, which is 9,000 yuan.

"If we fail to put up the fence within the stipulated time, we were fined 300 yuan per day. As a result, we had to work all day to complete the fences as fast as possible, sometimes until our hands were bleeding".

[ top ]

Behind Bars for supporting a "splittist"

Pema Kunsang is approximately 26 years old. He is a former monk of Kargyu Bhelgay Monastery, which is located in Rongbatsang District, Karze County, Karze "TAP", Sichuan Province.

Kunsang's father's name is Kayung Dorjee. He has seven family members consisting of his parents, three brothers, one sister and himself. His family ekes out their living by farming. Kunsang is originally from Shusar Village, Shusar Township, Karze County in Sichuan Province.

From the age of 11, Kunsang studied in Rongbatsang Chushor School for three years. Two years later, he joined Bhelgay Monastery and stayed for three years. During that period, Kunsang studied Buddhist Dialectics, Tibetan Grammar and basic Buddhist Philosophy in the monastic education centre.

Later he got admission into Karze Nangten Lobling (Karze Buddhist Institute) in Karze County, studying Tibetan Grammar and Art of Healing for six months. The institute had approximately 300 student at the time.

After six months' study at Karze Buddhist Institute, Kunsang returned to Bhelgay Monastery. He was given the responsibility of caretaker of the monastery which he served for more than five years. He then meditated in Jusong Meditation Centre in Jatsuka County for three years. On return once again to Bhelgey Monastery, he started doing public service.

Gradually, Kunsang became one of the high lamas of the monastery. He started conducting special religious prayers in Tibetan households in the local area.

When Geshe Sonam Phuntsok, the well-known Buddhist practitioner in Karze County, was arrested on 25 October 1999, while he was in a religious retreat in Wakhar Retreat Area, Karze County.

As soon as the news of Geshe's arrest spread across the town like wildfire, approximately 3,000 peaceful protestors including Lama Kunsang gathered and demonstrated in front of Rongbatsang sub-district office demanding Geshe's immediate and unconditional release.

Lama Kunsang appealed to many Chinese authorities for Geshe's release and tried to convince them of Geshe' innocence in all the allegations that were levelled against him. He strongly criticised the Chinese authorities for having detained Geshe and vociferously supported Geshe Sonam Phuntsok.

Owing to his harsh comments against Chinese authorities, Lama Kunsang came under suspicion. The Chinese authorities accused him of being one of the ringleaders of the spontabeous Karze demonstration on 25 and 26 October 1999.

In November 1999, Chinese police arrested Lama Kunsang on charges of "mobilising and masterminding" the Karze demonstration, and for opposing the Chinese authorities. It is reported that on a hidden camera he was captured making critical comments about Chinese officials. The video was later used against him as evidence. Opposition to the Chinese authorities is included as one of the charges against him.

Initially, Lama Kunsang was detained in Karze Detention Centre for three months. He suffered severe torture and beatings during his detention.

In February 2000, Karze People's Intermediate Court passed sentence on Lama Kunsang. He received five and a half years' sentence. Lama Kunsang is currently serving his sentence in Xinduqio Prison.

[ top ]

Religious restriction in Gaden Tashi Choeling Monastery

The informant, who wishes to remain anonymous, reported,

"I am originally from Tsekhog County, Malho 'TAP'. There are about eight members in my family and all of them are nomads. Tsekhog County consists of ten villages and ten monasteries. Zhabar Monastery has been the most restricted monastery in the county. The Chinese officials always conduct 're-education' campaign in Zhabar Monastery.

"I was a monk at Jadar Monastery which is originally named as Ganden Tashi Choeling. At the time of my enrolment, there were only 40 monks. Today there are about 120 monks in the monastery. In 2001, the Chinese authorities set the limit for monks at 80 and the rest were ordered to go to other monasteries. The monks below the age of 18 were not permitted to stay in the monastery.

"In 1999, the Chinese authorities started 'patriotic education' campaign in Jadar Monastery. They distributed documents to all the monks, which said there is one motherland. There were 15 chapters in the document. It also mentioned patriotism and denouncing the 'separatist'. From July 2000 and February 2001, the Chinese prohibited pictures of the Dalai Lama. Expulsion was the stated punishment for disobedience. If we keep the banned picture, it is considered as breaking the Chinese Law.

"In July 2001, a total of 30 officials came to the monastery including seven "work team" officials and others from both local and county level. Since the monastery is located not far from the county office, the officials would not sleep in the monastery overnight. They only come two or three times to the monastery. The main themes taught were patriotism to the nation and freedom of religion. In reality, we didn't have freedom of religion.

"Since 1988, Jadar Monastery has a Democratic Management Committee (DMC). At present five monks manage the DMC and these monks are elected for a period of five years. The chairman of the DMC is Gedun Gyatso and the vice-chairman is Choeyang Gyatso. The others are Kunga, Zoepa and Lobsang who are their subordinates.

"The Chinese authorities always restrain the DMC from increasing the number of monks in the monastery. The responsibility of the DMC is to forestall freedom posters, pro-independence slogans in the monastery, to find those who have connections with the Tibetan government-in-exile, and to eliminate all 'splittist' in the monastery. If any of those happen, the chairman of the DMC is held responsible.

"As the Chinese authorities disallowed monk below 18 years of age from studying in the monastery, we tried to set up a school for these small monks. The government rejected the idea. We sent a letter to the County office and township office concerning the matter but we didn't succeed.

"Many monks would like to go to India but the returnees say that India is too hot. On the other hand, the Chinese government do not give shan fein zhang (Chinese citizenship card) to the monks. Because of this, the monks can never leave the monastery. In February 2001, I went to try and get shang fein zhang from the county office but I did not get it because I was a monk.

"When the monks need to go to either China or Lhasa, they have to get Tong xin zhang (travel permit) from the Religious Department and also you have to return on time. If someone does not return on time, he is not allowed to stay in the monastery any more. Particularly in the case of a lama, he has to have an official who can guarantee in order to get the Tong xin zhang. If the Lama does not return on time, the person who has guaranteed would get into trouble. This means that there are lots of restrictions even to go to Lhasa."

Other issues

The informant also talked about conditions in the local area. He said, "Since the division of grassland among the families was introduced in the 1980s, many disputes have occured among the people. The water doesn't flow to the fertile lands but where the water flows, no grass grows. This is the main cause for major problems. The Chinese say everyhting belongs to the nation.

"When I was coming to India, the Chinese announced the Western Development Project and they were building roads in the nomads' area. The road construction is very close to my hometown - Tsekhog County. Lots of families are very poor in the county, but the government never spends money on the poor families. They are investing heavily in road construction from Tongren-Tsekhog-Henan-Luchu-Machu-Golog-Sichuan. Now they have constructed up to Tsekhog County. All the workers are Chinese. Although some Tibetans would like to work, the Chinese government forbids them."

The informant also shared information on the murder of a monk, "When I was in Lhasa, I came to know that a monk from Sichuan got killed in Yak Hotel. The monk was trying to escape from Tibet to India. It was said that he had 80,000 yuan, and the guide killed him and took all the money. When police arrested the guide, they confiscated the money which still remains in the hands of the police.

"Some people pretend to be a guide and then hand over escapees to the police. Guides have cheated many people so it is really hard to trust the guides. There are more people who have been cheated than there are people who could escape to India.

"I also heard that some businessmen from Amdo were detained when we were crossing the border. When they were having picnic in Dram-Nepal border, they burnt incense and shouted, 'Long Live the Dalai Lama'. Because of this they got arrested after their picnic. I don't know what happened to them later."

[ top ]

Winning Essays on Torture

TCHRD in collaboration with International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) organised an essay contest titled "Together Against Torture" among the Tibetan schools in and around Dharamsala in June 2002.

The United Nations General Assembly officially proclaimed 26 June as the UN International Day in support of Victims of Torture in 1997. Every year, the day is commemorated in support of victims of torture and to eliminate torture throughout the world.

Within the thematic context of torture, the students were given a range of topics:

  1. Why is it important to punish people who torture?
  2. How can we create a world without torture?
  3. Torture in Tibet
  4. How can we help torture victims?
  5. Could you forgive someone who tortures?
The three best essays of the competition are produced below. TCHRD has maintained the originality of the essays in both its content and style.

First Prize "Torture in Tibet" by Luesang, TCV Suja

Being a political prisoner, it is good experience how our land colonizer's torturing the people living in Tibet. After spending the few years in prison and suffered under the tragedy periods. A word torture is not so sweet to hear in my ears.

But today, by taking this opportunity and through personal experience, I wanted to share with the people of the world how the people of Tibet were suffering and torturing by the invadars.

Naturally the persons living in prison were lost their life freedom due to the cause of political situation and certain to suffer a lot. When I was in prison at the age of 15 years, I had seen lots of incidents un-image-able. From one of them, during the occasion of the Tibetan New Year, the official of the prison come inside and classified all the political prisoners amount of prisoners of all. Each one of them tools a prisoners and without any reasons or doing wrong deeds. They played a game by using the different kinds of tools for a human life. Some of we were so harsh body and no teeth presents in mouth and un-able to walk on our own feet. That was a real-drama-play which they have played for their enjoyment. It clearly shows that there was no reality human value and rights.

Especially truth, justice and equalities, were very rare like stars in day. Usually the way of their tortures were so varied but basically included in three types. Physically the prisoner had to works in construction, fields and so on without single day for rest in month and month. Also sometimes full 24 hours had to works. Without proper shoes have to wear. Imagine what would you feel if you were in that situation. Some people say it was impossible, though it was in reality.

Another way of torturing for prisoners were to learn soldiers train during the winter times. It was nothing less than except torturing both prisoners physical and mentally. At that times we got most belt and kicks. Also sometimes there was teaching on communist ideology by forcing and answering the answer in their thought. Without any desire to learn such lesson was absolutely in mentally torture. After all, torture was their goal. There was no fun for the prisoners.

However, what they planned programes and activities. All these were kinds of torture for prisoner. There was no excuse to I was child, woman, dont know and cant, to say even the causing sickness. Suffering and torturing in my country was not only in prison. But also wide varieties in the society, religoins and economically. etc.

Finally, I hope and request the people of the world loving in peace, justice have to cooperate us and help to cure our disease.

Second Prize "Torture in Tibet" by Wangdhen Kyab, TCV Suja

Being a human, the most important thing is acceptance of one's self-esteem by the society and obviously, the enjoyment of equal human rights. This is necessary for the basic human development. Thses basic human needs are completely uprooted in Tibet by the barbaric rule of Communist Chinese. Torture is not only a physical ill-treatment rather it affects mental, economic, political and psychological status of the Tibetan victims. Such inhuman regime by communist Chinese has been going on in Tibet since 1949 and no Tibetan knows how long it will continue. But, they all have hopes to seen an end to this inhuman regime in Tibet soon with the justice and support from the international communities across the globe and faithful pro-Tibetans.

The tortured Tibetan children have no turned into destitutes with their family members being imprisoned or slain by the Chinese government in response to their bid to raise voice against the communist regime and its injustice. Such destitutes have been increasing at alarming rate. This kind of violation against human rights raise serious international concers with respect to Tibet's future population, its government and the risk of Tibetan's valuable cultura and traditional deterioration. Let us all work to make heard the clarion call of threathened Tibet and its existence in the world map to the ears of our fellow brothers and sisters across the world.

Atmosphere of religion is spoiled in Tibet by torture and repression. Before occupation, a considerable percentage of population used to live a life of apiritual devotees (monk and nuns). There were more than six thousand monasterues and nunneries in Tibet. They had full freedom to practise religion at their wish. With the advent of Chinese rule, around 80 per cent or above it of monasteries and nunneries are destroyed. The devotees are done to death and some are expelled from the monasteries or nunneries. Now-a-days, there is hardly considerable percent of spiritual devotees left in Tibet when compared to the pre-Chinese rule ratio. Neverthelss, the few survivals live under the constant fear and torture by the dictatorial armies of China.

Torture of education in Tibet is limiteless and unimaginable detriment. The world praises Chinese's sacctiarin and superficial progress made in Tibet in terms of increased educational centres and technologies. But the reality is too harsh behind the veiled Chinese diplomacy over Tibet. There are many schools in Tibet but they are established with the intention to overshadow and uproot the rich Tibetan culture and language by Chinese ideologies and its language. Of these kind of development will prove deterrance to Tibetan culture in small and the world's culture deversity at large.

Our friend let us join hands and work for the liberation of tortured and enthreatened Tibetans from the inhuman Chinese rule. Nevertheless, let us unveil the double standard of Chinese diplomacy to the eyes of United Nations. May justice reign the so far injustice rule by the red Chinese.

Third Prize "How can we help torture victims?" by Tenzin Tsangyang, Upper TCV

We can help torture victims, firstly by providing them enough of their daily needs and expenditure for their injuries like beaten by electric shocks, beaten by electric rods, fractured boes and any other injuries due to the torturing. Then the torture victim mist consult with a counsellor. We must ask them that what are their problems, how can we help them and by helping them in different ways to think that they have someone who is helpful to them in their depressed life. If some torture victims who are so depressed and dont want to communicate with the others in the outside world must have a counselling with a counsellor, this might help the torture victims feel relieved. We also can help them in communicating with others. If any of the torture victims are not interested or do not have enough ability to study in the regular classes with other students must be given other opportunities. For example: If she knows a little tailoring we can send her to tailoring institution and after finishing the tailoring course, she can make a shop where she can stitch other's clothes and live her own life. we should also know whether the torture victim has any talents or interest in them and can help the development of their career. If you afford all the expenditures and facilities, you can ask for funds from different societies who are helping torture victims. They are many societies who are willing to help torture victims, first you can ask them to help build a mental clinic and some qualified counsellors for the clinic.If you dont get enough help or funds you can raise funds by making a small society yourself and organising fairs, different and interesting game which will attract many people, e.g tambola, selling lotteries, and giving useful things for the first threewho wins the lottery and use the rest of the money for the expenditure of torture victims. If some people who dont know anything about torture, you can tell them whatver you know and tell the reality of torture in Tibet. You can also show the books which is published by the Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy which is mostly about the situation and torture victims in Tibet. Lastly if you are a person who can think properly help people who have suffered so much and who are poor.

Profile of the Ist prize winner

Luesang, the first prize winner of the essay contest, is a former political prisoner of Tibet. He is currently 23 years old.

Luesang was born in Taktse County, Lhasa City. He became a monk when he was 12. He was arrested on 10 December 1994 when he was 15, after he and four others painted "Free Tibet" and similar slogans on a Chinese official's office. He was detained for four months in Taktse Prison. Luesang was then transferred to Trisam Labour Camp for one year and nine months when he was forced to do manual labour with the adults. He was told by prison officials that he had been tried and sentenced to two year's imprisonment.

When he was released from prison, he was no longer allowed to be a monk. He felt that he could not do anything else so he came to India. Luesang stated, "The worst thing was that we were forced to work for the whole day. We had no opportunity to get a proper education."

[ top ]

Cultural Development Society closed

Tenzin Rabgyal, a recently-arrived refugee reported to TCHRD, "In 2002, the Chinese authorities virtually closed the Cutural Development Society in Rebkong County, Malho "TAP", Qinghai Province.

The Chinese are always against anything that promotes Tibetan culture. On the pretext of the society having underlying political overtones, the Chinese authorities ordered for its closure without any prior notice.

Two Tibetan periodicals called Golden Bridge (Tib: Sesang) and The Backward Tibet were merged into one society and named as Cultural Developmental Society. It was a forum for pure cultural exchange through showcase of literary talent. There was no political significance attached to the aims and objectives of the society.

Rabgyal reported a separate incident that he witnessed during his journey, "On 3 April 2002, two Tibetan women pilgrims from Jintsa County, Qinghai Province, were travelling with us. At Amdo County in Nagchu Prefecture, the police checked the pilgrims for Shan fein zhang (Chinese citizenship card required for Tibetans from other regions). Since the two women were found without it, the police fined them 50 yuan each. A defaulter's fine on this matter is actually set at 100 yuan. Since the women were with little money, their fine was reduced to half the actual amount. Thousands of Chinese migrate to Tibet but Shan fein zhang is never a requirement for them. During travel, it is only the Tibetans who are checked for this card and not the Chinese. Hence, it is clearly a discrimination against the Tibetans."

Tenzin Rabgyal was born in 1980 in Tsolho County in Qinghai Province. He studied in Kenney County Middle School for four years. From 16 to 20 years, he was a monk at Rebkong Monastery.Then he studied in Sera Je Monastery for two years and once again returned to Rebkong Monastery for one year. A year later, he fled Tibet and arrived at Kathmandu, Nepal on 25 May 2002.

[ top ]

4th Preparatory Committee Meeting on WSSD in Bali, Indonesia

Mrs. Norzin Dolma, English Researcher of Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, attended the Asia Advocacy Workshop on Human Rights and Sustainable Development from 22 - 29 May 2002, followed by the 4th Preparatory Committee meeting on World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) from 27 - 7 June 2002 in Bali, Indonesia.

The Asia Advocacy workshop organised by Pax Romana (International Catholic Movement for Intellectual and Cultural Affairs) as part of their global action plan on sustainable development. Seventy-two participants from eleven different countries in the Asian sub-continent participated in the workshop.

At the 4th prepcom meeting on WSSD, Mrs Dolma extensively lobbied both government delegates and various NGOS concerning their support to TCHRD's accreditation.

TCHRD was seeking accreditation as an NGO to the WSSD. China had objected to the accreditation on the basis that TCHRD is "splittist". To China's proposal of No-Action Motion against TCHRD's application for accreditation, 97 member countries voted in favour of the motion, 37 against, 10 abstained and 55 absent on 31 May 2002.

Mrs. Dolma also attended Major Group caucuses and side events for the duration of the prepcom meetings. The caucuses included Women, Youth, Indigenous, Asia, Peace, Human Rights, Environment and Sustainable Development.

The draft political declaration prepared by Peace Caucus and Human Rights, Environment and Sustainable Development Caucus contains several Tibet languages and human rights references for inclusion in the final Chairman's text.

TCHRD representative established networks with many NGOs and spoke with several local and national media about TCHRD's accreditation in particular and Tibetan issues in general.

[ top ]

TCHRD attend ex-political prisoners' annual picnic

Approximately 25 former political prisoners of Drapchi Prison held an annual get-together at Norbulingka in Sidhpur, in mid June 2002. The gathering concluded with former inmates sharing their past experiences and future vision.

Five TCHRD staff members attended the picnic as a gesture of support and sympathy for all the sufferings these people had endured at the hands of Chinese authorities.

The staff attendees were Mrs. Tsewang Lhadon, Executive Director, Ms. Youdon Aukatsang, Senior Programme Officer, Mr. Ugyen Tsewang, Information Officer, Mr. Tenzin Norgay, Field Officer, and Mr. Lobsang Geyphel, the Centre's Driver.

[ top ]

Farewell to TCHRD staff

The Centre bids fond adieu to two TCHRD staff members, Lobsang Tsering and Lobsang Geyphel, both of who served the Centre with utmost dedication and sincerity over the years.

Mr. Lobsang Tsering served the Centre in the capacity of a Researcher since 1997. He will now pursue further studies in US under the Fulbright Scholarship Programme for two years.

Mr. Lobsang Geyphel, has been the Centre's Driver since 1999. In July 2002, Mr. Geyphel has joined the Security Department of the Tibetan Government-in-exile as a Driver.

All the TCHRD staff members and vounteers wish both Lobsangs all the very best in their future endeavour.